Paper title:
 The Polar Compass: Türkiye’s Foreign Policy and Arctic Observer Status
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2025.01.12
Published in:
Issue 1 (Vol. 31) / 2025
Publishing date:
2025-07-31
Pages:
273 - 296
Author(s):
Ezgi ŞAHIN, Merve Suna ÖZEL ÖZCAN
Abstract:
 The Arctic region has become an increasingly significant arena in international politics due to its energy potential, emerging maritime trade routes, and environmental vulnerabil-ity. As melting ice opens new access points, both Arctic and non-Arctic states have intensi-fied their involvement in the region, leading to a growing number of political, economic, and environmental interactions. This transformation has turned the Arctic into a strategi-cally contested area attracting global actors seeking influence, resources, and connectivi-ty. In this evolving context, Türkiye has gradually established a coherent Arctic policy, despite being a non-littoral state. Its accession to the Svalbard Treaty and application for observer status in the Arctic Council mark critical steps in aligning with regional legal and institutional frameworks. This article examines Türkiye’s developing engagement with the Arctic and evaluates its alignment with the normative principles of Arctic governance. It argues that Türkiye’s approach is shaped by a commitment to scientific contribution, envi-ronmental stewardship, and international cooperation, offering a constructive model for non-Arctic participation in the region’s multilateral architecture.
Keywords:
 Arctic, Türkiye’s Foreign Policy, Observer Status, Science Diplomacy.




References:
1. 5. Ulusal Arktik Bilimsel Araştırma Seferi (TASE V) Bilgilendirme Raporu [5. National Arctic Scientific Research Expedition (TASE V) In-formation Report], in https://kare.mam.tubitak.gov.tr.
2. A People-First Approach to Sustainable Development in the Arc-tic, in https://arctic-council.org/news/a-people-first-approach-to-sustainable-development-in-the-arctic/.
3. ACIA. Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact As-sessment, Cambridge University Press, 2004, https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/impacts-of-a-warming-arctic-2004/786.
4. Aleksandrov Oleg, Russia’s Arctic Policy: Offence vs. Defense, “Rivista di Studi Politici Internazionali”, 2017, Vol. 84, No. 11, p. 95–106.
5. Antarctic Treaty, in https://www.mfa.gov.tr/antarktika-antlasmasi.tr.mfa.
6. Arctic Council SDWG, Report on Arctic Energy, in https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/items/d9f714ff-f5a3-4fa5-9540-4fe8779cc7fa.
7. Arctic Council Secretariat, Rules of Procedure (Adopted at the 1st Minis-terial Meeting in 1998, revised at the 8th Ministerial Meeting in Ki-runa, 2013), Tromsø, Arctic Council Secretariat, 2015.
8. Arctic Council Secretariat, Rules of Procedure, Tromsø, Arctic Council Secretariat, 2015, in https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstream/handle/11374/940/2015-09-01_Rules_of_Procedure_website_version.pdf.
9. Arctic Council, Member States, in https://arctic-council.org/about/states/.
10. Arctic Seaways, in https://www.arcticcentre.org/EN/arcticregion/Maps/Seaways.
11. ArcticPortal, Arctic Definitions, in https://arcticportal.org/maps/download/arctic-definitions.
12. ArcticPortal, UNCLOS Governance, in https://arcticportal.org/shipping-portlet/governance/unclos.
13. Biresselioglu Mehmet Efe, Demir Muhittin Hakan, Solak Berfu, Altıncı Şebnem, Egeli Sıtkı, Assessing Türkiye’s Prospective Involvement in the Arctic Region: A Qualitative Inquiry from Energy and Environmen-tal Perspectives, in “Social Sciences”, 2022, Vol. 11, No. 10, p. 480–496.
14. China’s Arctic Policy (White Paper), in https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/01/26/content_281476026660336.htm
15. Czarny Roman, U.S. and the Arctic in the Last Two Decades, in “Slovak Journal of Political Sciences”, 2016, Vol. 16, No. 2, p. 190–206.
16. Dodds Klaus, Nuttall Mark, The Scramble for the Poles: The Ge-opolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016.
17. Dodds Klaus, Nuttall Mark, The Scramble for the Poles: The Ge-opolitics of the Arctic and Antarctic, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016.
18. Fragkouli Marina, China’s Efforts to Control the Arctic Rimland: A New Cold War, in “HAPSc Policy Briefs Series”, 2021, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 139–149.
19. Güçyetmez Ferdi, The Impact of NATO Enlargement on Russian Secu-rity in the Baltic and Arctic, in “Manas Journal of Social Studies”, 2023, Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 1564–1578.
20. Hund J. Ann (ed.), Antarctica and the Arctic Circle: A Geographic En-cyclopedia of the Earth’s Polar Regions, Vol. 1: A–I, Santa Barbara, ABC CLIO, 2014.
21. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarc-tic), Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), in https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg2/polar-regions-arctic-and-antarctic/.
22. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), China’s Push in Strategy in the Arc-tic and Its Impact on Regional Governance, in https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/chinas-push-strategy-arctic-and-its-impact-regional-governance.
23. Jensen Leif Christian, International Relations in the Arctic: Nor-way and the Struggle for Power in the New North, London, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
24. Kaplan O. Jed, New Mark, Arctic Climate Change with a 2°C Global Warming: Timing, Climate Patterns and Vegetation Change, in “Climatic Change”, 2006, Vol. 79, p. 213–241.
25. Kobzeva Maria, Strategic partnership setting for Sino-Russian cooper-ation in Arctic shipping, “The Polar Journal”, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 334–352.
26. Limon Onur, Arktik Konseyi ve Türkiye’nin Unutulan Arktik Konseyi Gözlemci Üyelik Başvurusu [Arctic Council and Turkey's Forgot-ten Arctic Council Observer Membership Application], in “International Journal of Politics & Securi-ty (IJPS)”, 2021, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 302–335.
27. Liu Nina, The Geopolitical Lessons from the Arctic to Antarctica, in “United Service”, 2023, Vol. 74, No. 1, p. 12–14.
28. Map of the Arctic Administrative Areas, in https://www.arcticcentre.org/EN/arcticregion/Maps/Administrative-areas.
29. Martynova Marina, EU, Russia and China Arctic Strategies: Compara-tive Analysis, in Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings”, Vol. 4, Varazdin, 2019, p. 773–778.
30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Türkiye, Antarctic Treaty (1959, acceded 1995), Ankara, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2022, in https://www.mfa.gov.tr/antarktika-antlasmasi.tr.mfa.
31. Osthagen Andreas, Raspotnik Andy, Partners or Rivals? Norway and the European Union in the High North, in Nengye Liu, Elizabeth A. Kirk, Tore Henriksen (eds.), The European Union and the Arctic, Leiden, Brill Nijhoff, 2017, p. 97–118.
32. Osthagen Andreas, The Arctic Security Region: Misconceptions and Contradictions, in “Polar Geography”, Vol. 44, 2021, No. 1, p. 55–74.
33. Pursiainen Christer Henrik, Alden Chris, Bertelsen Rasmus Gjedssø, The Arctic and Africa in China’s Foreign Policy: How Different Are They and What Does This Tell Us?, in “Arctic Review on Law & Poli-tics”, 2021, Vol. 12, p. 31–55.
34. Razvan Ilea Mihai, The Evolution of the International System in the Context of Climatic Changes in the Arctic, in “Strategic Impact”, 2020, Vol. 75, No. 2, p. 89–101.
35. Rothwell R. Donald, The Arctic in International Affairs: Time for a New Regime?, “The Brown Journal of World Affairs”, 2008, Vol. 15, No. 11, p. 241–253.
36. Şahin Ezgi, Özel Özcan Merve Suna, Bölgesel Güvenlik Kom-pleksi Bağlamında Artan Arktik Rekabeti ve Askerî Güvenlik [Increasing Arctic Competi-tion and Military Security in the Context of the Regional Security Complex], in “Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi”, 2024, Vol. 13 (Special Issue), p. 90–111.
37. The Arctic Council: A Quick Guide, in https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/items/5b1cf319-c3d0-427a-b874-78ce0e32bba4
38. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜ-BİTAK) Marmara Research Center (MAM), Türkiye’s 4th Arctic Ex-pedition Launches with 16 Research Projects, Daily Sabah, 1 July 2024, in https://www.dailysabah.com/turkiye/turkiyes-4th-arctic-expedition-launches-with-16-research-projects.
39. TÜBİTAK Türkiye’nin Arktik Yol Haritası: Bilim, Diplomasi ve Güvenlik Perspektifinden Bir Değerlendirme Değerlendirme [TÜBİTAK, Turkey's Arctic Roadmap: An Assessment from the Perspective of Sci-ence, Diplomacy and Secu-rity], Ankara, TÜBİTAK, 2023.
40. U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit, Arctic Development and Transport, in https://toolkit.climate.gov/regions/alaska-and-arctic/arctic-development-and-transport.
41. Walton C. Dale, The Polar Pivot: Great Power Competition in the Arctic and Antarctica, in “Comparative Strategy”, 2023, Vol. 42, No. 1, p. 171–172.