Paper title:
  Returning to Quad: India’s Search for Regional Security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2023.02.08
Published in:
Issue 2 (Vol. 29) / 2023
Publishing date:
2023-11-01
Pages:
401 – 424
Author(s):
Ferhat Cagri Aras, Ekber Kandemir
Abstract:
 Consisting of the US, India, Japan, and Australia, the Quad consultative forum emerged as a new multi-foreign policy formation in the Indo-Pacific. Described as a strategic partnership in the face of China’s increasing expansionist policies, the Quad also explains India’s foreign policy’s strategic autonomy and pluralistic approaches. In recent years, India’s actions to improve its strategic alliances against the expansionist states in the region within the framework of the liberal order brought the Quad back to the fore of activities aimed at limiting China’s actions in the region. In this context, the primary purpose of the Quad to establish a strategic partnership stems from the desire to protect maritime interests. Ensuring the security of energy resources, free trade and navigation, disputes over the border and continental shelf, and economic-based disputes are the main reasons for bringing the Quad back to the agenda. While India’s pluralistic foreign policy understanding and China’s recent policy perception overlap, the conflicting environment in the global world order pushes China to an expansionist policy in the Indo-Pacific; India, on the other hand, is trying to balance China by establishing various alliances. Although the scale of the economic engagement of the US with countries party to the Quad is no more significant than China’s, Quad 2.0 is now a structure where the state parties can take joint steps for security and strategic partnerships due to military interests and cultural ties from the past.
Keywords:
 Quad, India, China, South Asia, Indo-Pacific, Regional, Security.




References:
1. Abe Shinzo, MOFA: Speech by H.E. Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan, at the Parliament of the Republic of India ‘Confluence of the Two Seas’, 2007, in https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html
2. Aydin Gulsen, Yüce Müge, China’s Hard Power versus Soft Power in Central Asia: An Analysis of the One Belt One Road Initiatiative as a Soft Power Instrument, in “Caucasus International”, Vol. 8, 2018, pp. 63-76.
3. Bagchi Indrani, Focus on Covid in Quad Plus Meet, in “The Times of India”, 2020, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/jaishankar-discusses-covid-19-with-counterparts-in-us-5-other-countries/articleshow/75702875.cms.
4. Baruah M. Darshana, India in the Indo-Pacific: New Delhi’s Theather of Opportunity, in “Carnegie Endowment for International Peace”, 2020, https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/30/india-in-indo-pacific-new-delhi-s-theather-of-opportunity-pub-82205.
5. Caglar Kaya Yasin, Kiprizli Goktug, Does Democratic peace Theory Genuinely Envision Global Peace? A Critical Approach, in “Journal of International Studies”, Vol. 15, 2019, pp. 73-86.
6. Cannon J. Brendon, Rossiter Ash, Locating the Quad: Informality, Institutional Flexibility, and Future Alignment in the Indo-Pacific, in “International Politics”, 2022, Vol. 1, No. 22, DOI: 10.1057/s41311-022-00383-y.
7. Collinson Elena, Australian Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative, in https://www.australiachinarelations.org/content/australian-perspectives-belt-and-road-initiative.
8. De Silva Shakthi, Quad 2.0: Australia’s Reaction to the ‘China Threat.’, in “Journal of Strategic and Global Studies”, Vol. 6, 2023, No. 1, pp. 14–24.
9. Denisov Igor, Paramonov Oleg, Arapova Ekaterina, Safranchuk Ivan, Russia, China, and the Concept of Indo-Pacific, in “Journal of Eurasian Studies”, Vol. 12, 2021, No. 1, pp. 72–85. DOI: 10.1177/1879366521999899.
10. Flitton Daniel, Who Really Killed the Quad 1.0?, in "The Interpreter", 2020, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/who-really-killed-quad-10.
11. Freidberg L. Aaron, The Growing Rivalry Between America and China and the Future of Globalization, in “Texas National Security Review”, Vol. 5, 2022, No. 1, pp. 95–119, DOI: 10.15781/B0SB-PY52.
12. Haidar Suhasini, Is the Quad Rising after China’s Challenge at the LAC?, in “The Hindu”, September 18, 2020, https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/is-the-quad-rising-after-chinas-challenge-at-the-lac/article62107439.ece.
13. Huebert Rob, A New Cold War in the Arctic?! The Old One Never Ended!, in “Arctic yearbook”, 2019, https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2019/
2019-commentaries/325-a-new-cold-war-in-the-arctic-the-old-one-never-ended.
14. Kaplan D. Robert, A New Cold War Has Begun, in “Foreign Policy”, 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/01/07/a-new-cold-war-has-begun/.
15. Kiprizli Goktug, Seçkin Köstem, The Onset of BRICS Cooperation on Climate Change: Material Change, Ideational Convergence, and the Road to Copenhagen 2009, in “Third World Quarterly”, Vol. 44, 2023, No. 6, p. 1201.
16. Koga Kei, Japan and the Development of Quadrilateral Cooperation, in “Pensamiento Propio”, 2021, pp. 157–186.
17. Koga Kei, The Rise of China and Japan’s Balancing Strategy: Critical Junctures and Policy Shifts in the 2010s, in “Journal of Contemporary China”, Vol. 25, 2016, No. 101, pp. 777–791.
18. Kondapalli Srikanth, China’s Evolving Naval Presence in the Indian Ocean Region: An Indian Perspective, in David Brewster (ed.), India and China at Sea: Competition for Naval Dominance in the Indian Ocean, New Delhi, Oxford Academic, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199479337.003.0007.
19. Laidi Zaki. Rethinking Post-Cold War, in “Economic and Political Weekly”, Vol. 29, 1994, No. 32, pp. 2067–2069.
20. Lau Raymond Kwun-Sun, The Rise and Fall of China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’: Implications for US-China Geopolitical Competition in the Indo-Pacific, in “Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations”, Vol. 2, 2022, No. 8, pp. 1–15.
21. Lind Jennifer, Asia’s Other Revisionist Power, in “Foreign Affairs”, 2017, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2017-02-13/asias-other-revisionist-power?gad=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw3ueiBhBmEiwA4BhspF1K5Daiqw
PcpUZR6vvuQcQFvNm-2ilz3j__-y47MqSCZZPpKZvzmRoC25YQAvD_BwE.
22. Madan Tanvi, Fateful Triangle: How China Shaped U.S.-India Relations During the Cold War, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, 2020.
23. Madan Tanvi, The Quad as a Security Actor, in “Asia Policy”, Vol. 29, 2022, No. 4, pp. 49–56, DOI: 10.1353/asp.2022.0065.
24. Mammadli Rasim, Kalfaoglu Rabia, BRICS in the Arctic: The Member-States’ Interests and the Group’s Disregard, in “Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations”, Vol. 7, 2021, No.1, pp. 189-220.
25. Mankikar Kalpit A, Preserving National Security, the Xi Jinping Way, in “Issue Brief of Observer Research Foundation (ORF)”, 2021. https://www.orfonline.org/research/preserving-national-security-the-xi-jinping-way/.
26. Medcalf Rory, Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific, in “The Asan Forum”, 2015. https://theasanforum.org/reimagining-asia-from-asia-pacific-to-indo-pacific/.
27. Mermer Cengiz Topel, QUAD’ın Güney Pasifik’teki Tamamlayıcı Halkası; AUKUS [QUAD’s Companion Ring in the South Pacific; AUKUS], in “Türk Asya Stratejik Arastirmalar Merkezi”, 2022. https://tasam.org/tr-TR/Icerik/70115/quadin_guney_pasifikteki_tamamlayici_halkasi_aukus.
28. Paik Wooyeal, Park Jae Jeok, The Quad’s Search for Non-Military Roles and China’s Strategic Response: Minilateralism, Infrastructure Investment, and Regional Balancing, in “Journal of Contemporary China”, Vol. 30, No. 127, 2021, pp. 36–52. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2020.1766908.
29. Panda Jagannath, Beijing’s ‘Asian NATO’ Maxim on Quad Is Structural, in “Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA)”, 2019, https://idsa.in/system/files/news/PacNet-Commentary-Beijing.pdf.
30. Panda Jagannath, India, the Blue Dot Network, and the ‘Quad Plus’ Calculus, in “The Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs”, Vol. 3, 2020, No. 3, pp. 3–21.
31. Panda Jagannath, India’s Call on China in the Quad: A Strategic Arch between Liberal and Alternative Structures, in “Rising Powers Quarterly”, Vol. 3, 2018, No. 2, pp. 83–111.
32. Pant Harsh V., Anant Singh Mann, India’s Malabar Dilemma, in “The Issue Brief of Observer Research Foundation (ORF)”, 2020. https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ORF_IssueBrief_
393_Malabar.pdf .
33. Ploberger Christian, One Belt, One Road – China’s New Grand Strategy, in “Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies”, Vol. 15, 2017, No. 3, pp. 289–305. DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2017.1346922.
34. Rai, Ashok, Quadrilateral Security Dialogue 2 (Quad 2.0) – a Credible Strategic Construct or Mere ‘Foam in the Ocean’?, in “Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India”, Vol. 14, 2018, No. 2, pp. 138–48.
35. Roy-Chaudhury Rahul, de Estrada Kate Sullivan, India, the Indo-Pacific and the Quad, in “Survival”, Vol. 60, 2018,No. 3, pp. 181–194..2018.1470773.
36. Sarkar Mrittika Guha, China and QUAD 2.0: Between Response and Regional Construct, in “Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India”, Vol. 16, 2020, No. 1, pp. 110–130.
37. Shinzō Abe, Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond, in “Project Syndicate”, 2012. https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe.
38. Siddiqui Kalim, One Belt and One Road, China’s Massive Infrastructure Project to Boost Trade and Economy: An Overview, in “International Critical Thought”, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2019, pp. 214–35.
39. Singh Bhubhindar, Japan’s Responses to China’s Rise: Soft Balancing in Southeast Asia, in “Asian Security”, Vol. 18, 2022, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
40. Storey, Henry, Why Australia Shouldn’t Put All Its Eggs in the Quad Basket, in “The Interpreter”, 2022. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/why-australia-shouldn-t-put-all-its-eggs-quad-basket.
41. Sullivan De Estrada Kate, India and Order Transition in the Indo-Pacific: Resisting the Quad as a ‘Security Community.’, in “The Pacific Review“, Vol. 36, 2023, No. 2, pp. 378–405. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2022.2160792.
42. Sun Degang, Yahia H. Zoubir, Securing China’s ‘Latent Power’: The Dragon’s Anchorage in Djibouti, in “Journal of Contemporary China”, Vol. 30, 2021, No. 130, pp. 677–692. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2020.1852734.
43. Tarapore Arzan, Zone Balancing: India and the Quad’s New Strategic Logic, in “International Affairs”, Vol. 99, 2023, No. 1, pp. 239–257.
44. The White House, Joint Statement from Quad Leaders, in “Briefing Room”, September 24, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/24/joint-statement-from-quad-leaders/.
45. Vergun David, Freedom of Navigation in South China Sea Critical to Prosperity, Says Indo- Pacific Commander, in “U.S. Department of Defense”, May 30, 2019. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2025105/
freedom-of-navigation-in-south-china-sea-critical-to-prosperity-says-indo-pacif/.
46. Walton David, Australia and the Quad, in “East Asian Policy”, Vol. 14, 2022, No. 01, pp. 39–55. DOI:10.1142/S1793930522000034.
47. Wei Zongyou, The Evolution of the ‘QUAD’: Driving Forces, Impacts, and Prospects, in “China International Strategy Review”, Vol. 4, 2022, No. 2, pp. 288–304.